« September 2013 | Main | November 2013 »
Thursday, October 31, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Thursday, October 31, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
UPDATE: Here's more
Thursday, October 31, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
That's OK with me and not a surprise. Now if they can just make sure that the people enrolling in medicaid are poor and SHOULD be on the program AND if they can put it on a sound financial footing ... Unfortunately neither very likely.
Thursday, October 31, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Wednesday, October 30, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
YIKES! Whale of a tale!
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
On a milk carton?
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Neat article put together by polling "experts".
The Atlantic recently assembled a panel of 12 scientists, entrepreneurs, engineers, historians of technology, and others to assess the innovations that have done the most to shape the nature of modern life. The main rule for this exercise was that the innovations should have come after widespread use of the wheel began, perhaps 6,000 years ago. That ruled out fire, which our forebears began to employ several hundred thousand years earlier. We asked each panelist to make 25 selections and to rank them, despite the impossibility of fairly comparing, say, the atomic bomb and the plow. (As it happens, both of these made it to our final list: the discovery and application of nuclear fission, which led to both the atomic bomb and nuclear-power plants, was No. 21 of the top 50, ahead of the moldboard plow, which greatly expanded the range of land that farmers could till, at No. 30.) We also invited panelists to add explanations of their choices, and I followed up with several of them and with other experts in interviews.
Here are some of the picks:
#1 The Printing Press (the 1430's)
#2 Electricity (late 19th century)
#3 Penicillin (1928)
#10 The steam engine (1712); one place behind the internet (1960's)
#25 Alphabetization (fist millenium BC) Why wasn't this higher on the list?
#41 Paper money (11th century)
# 50 The combine harvester
It's an interesting list to look over. #11 was something I naver heard of (or heard of when I was taking chemistry and had since forgotten): Nitrogen fixation (1918). Allows for whole new classes of fertilizers.
Some of the choices are crazy; "the pill" is #20, ahesd of a whole slew of vastly more imoratn things.
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Carney, stumbling and bumbling ...
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
UPDATE: Here is tonight's coverage of this on NBC.
NBC News. Not members of the vast right wing conspiracy.
Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC NEWS that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by the new health care law. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”
None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date -- the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example -- the policy would not be grandfathered.
Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”
That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them.
There's plenty more if you hit the link.
Monday, October 28, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
This one, very poignant and very fascinating - the 1946 Series between the same two current teams, St. louis and Boston.
A World Away, the Seventh Game; Close at Hand, Condemned Nazis
And then there's this - remember Luid Tiant?
Born in Mexico, Living in Florida, Tiant’s Wife Is a Fervent Boston Fan
Monday, October 28, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
He's terrible, as is the Republican - I wouldn't dream of voting for either.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Sunday, October 27, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Sunday, October 27, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
UPDATE: Here's an article about this speech:... Ted Cruz addressed the concerns of any Iowa Republicans who reject him as too rigid, arguing he knows exactly how to unify the GOP and turn the country around. The answer: “Restore historic economic growth.”
At the Reagan dinner.
Sunday, October 27, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Pretty good. The interviewer is Matt Lewis, a young journalist. The man answering the questions is Russell Moore, the new head of the Southern Baptist Convention.
Saturday, October 26, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
I heard this guy on Imus a couple of weeks ago - very revealing.
The book is "The System." Before you go out an duby it, read the amazon reviews.
Saturday, October 26, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Friday, October 25, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
For some of my friends -
the sub-title of the website is "Small Steps Toward Greener Living"
"Sustainable Baby Steps": The Dangers of Recycled Toilet Paper And a Safer Alternative
Huh?
If you're really ready to go green and live healthy, cloth toilet paper is the answer. I know, I know...it sounds pretty "out there" when you first hear about it. ...
Toilet paper itself is a pretty new invention. Historically we've used Sears catalogs, soft plant material (such as broad leaves) and yes, cloth. There were a few key differences: Cloth wipes back in the day weren't washed after each use and family members may have actually shared the same dirty cloth. Um yeah, that's not what we're recommending here.
The first concern of most is: Is it sanitary?
The answer is absolutely...if it's done right.
Urine is 100% sterile, so absolutely no worries there. Feces obviously isn't ...
As I've mentioned above, we've found pretreating or presoaking to be unnecessary and may actually lead to the need for extra care if they soak too long or get too stinky.
Cloth wipes can be washed in any load of laundry that doesn't include cloth napkins, dishcloths, towels etc. Be wary washing them with jeans as you'll likely find a few in your pockets when you go out and then get to explain it to curious friends. ...
There's more - hit the link.
Friday, October 25, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Here's the prior post I put up a couple of days ago, with the enitre conversation. Audio: Sean Hannity calls Obamacare helpline, gets a cordial operator. Will she still have a job tomorrow? I actually heard the original conversation while driving.
The lady was on Hannity's TV show last night.
Friday, October 25, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In a speech at the UN. Primarily about eliminating weapons of mass destruction. Remind me again why we still have thousands of nuclear weapons and plenty of poison gas?
“It is sadly ironic that States vociferous in their condemnation of chemical weapons are silent on the continued possession of nuclear weapons. The international community must appeal and act with one voice to ban all weapons of mass destruction,” the Archbishop said.
Archbishop Chullikatt appealed to the international community to “counter the logic of fear with the ethic of responsibility.” In doing so, nations can begin to foster trust and dialogue for the greater good of the world. Citing an often-used phrase of Pope Francis, the Archbishop said that failing to do so would only risk falling into a “globalization of indifference.”
Thursday, October 24, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
As the Dr. jumps into the future to describe how things are going in 2016, as in the worst is yet to come. Read the excerpt below or hit the link - but here's the last line in the op ed: "It is also no wonder that three years ago members of Congress got themselves exempted from the Affordable Care Act. They may have passed the law, but they're not stupid."
Even before the ACA's launch in 2013, many physicians—seeing the changes in their profession that lay ahead—had begun talking their children out of going to medical school. After the launch, compensation fell, while nothing in the ACA stopped lawsuits and malpractice premiums from rising. Doctors must now see many more patients each day to meet expenses, all while dealing with the mountains of paperwork mandated by the health-care law.
******
But doctor shortages are only the beginning.
Even before the ACA cut $716 billion from its budget, Medicare only reimbursed hospitals and doctors for 70%-85% of their costs. Once this cut further reduced reimbursements, and the ACA added stacks of paperwork, more doctors refused to accept Medicare: It just didn't cover expenses.
Then there is the ACA's Medicare (government) board that dictates and rations care, and the board has begun to cut reimbursements. Some physicians now refuse even to take patients over 50 years old, not wanting to be burdened with them when they reach Medicare age. Seniors aren't happy.
Medicaid in 2016 has similar problems. A third of physicians refused to accept new Medicaid patients in 2013, and with Medicaid's expansion and government cuts, the numbers of doctors who don't take Medicaid skyrocketed. The uninsured poor now have insurance, but they can't find a doctor, so essentially the ACA was of no help.
******
Patients who can't afford concierge medicine but have seen their doctor take that route are out of luck: They have been added to the swelling rolls of patients taken care of by the shrinking pool of physicians. So even people with "private" insurance have found that the quality of their health care declined. Nowadays, many are forced instead to see a nurse or other health-care provider. The traditional doctor-patient relationship is now reserved primarily for those who can pay extra.
All of the above, and more if you read the op ed, are sure to happen. Which is really why Obamacare, even when/if they fix the website, will never really be implemented - or if implemented eventually thrown out.
Thursday, October 24, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Here's a quote from Pope Francis last month: "Jesus cannot be known in First Class".
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0)
Ha! Why didn't they use them to begin with?
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
While the Southern Hemisphere Championship is over; this is the third match between New Zealand and Australia for the Bledisoe Cup, indicative of their annual competition. The match is a "dead rubber" since New Zealand has already retained the cup by winning the prior two matches. Unlike the World Series, you still play these matches in rugby (and in cricket).
Very good match, with seven tries. The full match can be seen on youtube here.
Highlights:
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
And the head, execs, making a pretty good penny. BUT, they have stabilized the Center fiscally and their salaries and bonuses are in-line with other medical centers in the area.If you don't want to read the whole feature, which isn't that long and is good, the 2 minute video does sum it up.
CEO's prescription is healing Westchester Medical's financial ills, but at what cost?
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
A quite amusing look at the Obamacare fiasco and it's supporters. (Deja vu; go here for my experience as I tried to navigate the system as part of a CE course.)
Joan Walsh favors total denial:
On the one hand, yes, it's important for Democrats to acknowledge when government screws up, and to fix it.
On the other hand, when liberals rush conscientiously to do that, they only encourage the completely unbalanced and unhinged coverage of whatever the problem may be. . . .
Since I had heard Obama's Monday remarks widely previewed as an "apology" for the problems of Healthcare.gov, I was glad to hear him take a defiant tone.
Here's the end of the column -
A reader passes along a Reuters story from June 2010, during the BP oil spill: ...
... A New York Times story from the preceding month quotes then-Interior Secretary Ken Salazar: "Our job is basically to keep the boot on the neck of British Petroleum."
Our reader wonders why Obama and Kathleen Sebelius have been so much more muted in their response to the ObamaCare fiasco. No doubt the answer is that for them to kick the ass or put a boot on the neck of the responsible party would require an impossible degree of physical flexibility.
Wednesday, October 23, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Almost amusing, but I guess if you're a lawyer or professor it rankles.
From the (Law Professor) Ann Althouse blog. And she links to the original "meant-to-be-read" NY Times article.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
An attack ad, against Terry McAuliffe, running for governor in Virginia. Evidently it polls very well with focus groups.
Matt Mackowiak of Potomac Strategy Group, writes in with some focus group research on one of their latest ads, a particularly hard-hitting one tying Terry McAuliffe to a "Gang of Five" who want to "Detroit" the state of Virginia.
We ran a focus group, conducted by nationally-respected McLaughlin and Associates, to test the effectiveness of our "Don't Let Them Detroit Virginia" ad, which you exclusively reported a few weeks back.
Here's the ad, which has now been viewed over 20,000 times on YouTube alone.
Here's a short summary of ballot movement after viewing:
GOP voters: +8
Dem voters: +4
Independents: +2
Women: +4 (McAuliffe loses 4)
Men: +5
Over 40: +6
Overall ballot: +5
The question is, will casual, channel-flipping viewers give it the attention that folks in a focus group will?
Here's the ad.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
UPDATE: Woman nearly faints while President was speaking - he did get off a good one liner while she was being helped.
I guess if you're a supporter, it's good to know.
Tuesday, October 22, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
A nice discussion. The lady was honest; even read her script to him. Hope she still has a job tomorrow.
Monday, October 21, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
From CNN.
Monday, October 21, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Check the picture and article.
Of course Brigid has brother, two nieces and their families in Aussie - but not in Sydney.
Here's an article - and arson is involved!
"three major fires could merge and threaten the entire Blue Mountains region."
Monday, October 21, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
In the weekend NY Times. Very interesting; an economics wonk.
Here's a little bit of the Q & A - and the whole interview only takes a few minutes to read.
How does “Irrational Exuberance,” the title of one of your books, affect the stock market, and how does that fit into the efficient-market theory?
Well, the efficient-market theory is a half-truth. The half-truth is that it’s not easy to make a lot of money fast, and that you can go for years losing money, even if you’re a very smart person.
Where the theory goes wrong is that it says you should just assume that there’s no point in trying to beat the market — or that you should guide economic policy under the assumption that there aren’t any market bubbles.
So, are there bubbles?
Yes, they happen all the time. Most of the action in the aggregate stock market is bubbles. That wouldn’t be as true for individual stocks, but it’s true for the overall market.
You’ve been writing in your columns about real estate bubbles — like the bubble that burst and led to the financial crisis that we’re still recovering from now. You’ve found that real estate prices generally move more slowly than stock prices. Why is that?
It’s been true until now, anyway. One reason is that real estate is mainly a market of amateurs; it’s not easy for people to move quickly.
There’s a lot of momentum in that market. But professionals are coming in, and it could change.
Monday, October 21, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
An amusing video and article from the Wall St. Journal.
I hardly ever throw a tie out (unless it's got a stain) so I am suddenly back "in" and on the cutting edge with "skinny ties". Who knew? Of course some of mine are 25-30 years old (but still look good...). FULL DISLCOSURE: I wear a tie maybe once a week, if that.
Monday, October 21, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
From the Telegraph (UK)
And now it seems that Messner, like other locals and climbers who have long reported strange footprints and fearsome silhouettes in the snowy landscape, is neither misguided nor mad. DNA analysis of two “yeti hair” samples, one collected from the Western Himalayas and one from Bhutan, has uncovered a genetic match to a species of ancient polar bear. Professor Bryan Sykes, the Oxford University geneticist who conducted the analysis by comparing the hair DNA to a polar bear jawbone found in Norway, has called the finding “exciting and completely unexpected”.
The dazzling discovery raises the possibility that a mysterious beast previously unknown to science indeed roams the peaks, and not just the fevered imaginations of locals. Professor Sykes offers two alternative explanations as to how an animal living today in the Asian mountains shares its genes with a Nordic polar bear that existed between 40,000 and 120,000 years ago: the creature is possibly a sub-species of brown bear that shares a common ancestor with the polar bear, or there has been recent interbreeding between brown bears and descendants of the polar bear.
Sunday, October 20, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Iread about this in about four differnet places yesterday; the video is from CNN and the article beneath it is from The Guardian (UK).
The Guardian article is more in-depth and presents several perspectives on the story -
Anthropologists unearthed the skull at a site in Dmanisi, a small town in southern Georgia, where other remains of human ancestors, simple stone tools and long-extinct animals have been dated to 1.8m years old.
Experts believe the skull is one of the most important fossil finds to date, but it has proved as controversial as it is stunning. Analysis of the skull and other remains at Dmanisi suggests that scientists have been too ready to name separate species of human ancestors in Africa. Many of those species may now have to be wiped from the textbooks.
******
The site was a busy watering hole that human ancestors shared with giant extinct cheetahs, sabre-toothed cats and other beasts. The remains of the individuals were found in collapsed dens where carnivores had apparently dragged the carcasses to eat. They are thought to have died within a few hundred years of one another.
******
The odd dimensions of the fossil prompted the team to look at normal skull variation, both in modern humans and chimps, to see how they compared. They found that while the Dmanisi skulls looked different to one another, the variations were no greater than those seen among modern people and among chimps.
The scientists went on to compare the Dmanisi remains with those of supposedly different species of human ancestor that lived in Africa at the time. They concluded that the variation among them was no greater than that seen at Dmanisi. Rather than being separate species, the human ancestors found in Africa from the same period may simply be normal variants of H erectus.
Saturday, October 19, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
From the NY Times - Cheney has a book coming out about his health battle, which ended with a heart transplant.
"In New Book, Cheney Recalls 5 Heart Attacks and His Brush With Death"
Former Vice President Dick Cheney was so close to death in 2010 that he said farewell to his family members and instructed them to have his body cremated and the ashes returned to Wyoming, he writes in a new book on his long battle with heart disease.
Mr. Cheney ultimately survived the emergency surgery that night and went on to have a heart transplant at age 71 that has left him re-energized five years after leaving office. But for the first time, he describes a 35-year medical struggle that he kept generally private in vivid personal detail.
Now, in case you're wondering (and who wouldn't?), here's the answer to whether Cheney got "special accomodation", jumping the line to get a transplant.
He spent nine hours on the operating table and 35 days in the hospital, much of it unconscious, dreaming about living in a villa in Italy. He spent 20 months waiting for a new heart from a donor who has never been publicly identified. Dr. Reiner says the former vice president received no “special accommodation” and in fact waited twice the average time.
And the last paragraph of the article:
Mr. Cheney says his survival was possible only because of medical innovation: “The health care system that produced such rapid development and has driven the dramatic reduction in the incidence of death from heart disease over the past 40 years is a national treasure and deserves to be preserved and protected.”
Friday, October 18, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
A few excerpts, but hit the link for the full blast.
"Why the exchanges are worse than even the critics imagined."
This isn't some coding error, or even the Health and Human Service Department's usual incompetence. The failures that have all but disabled ObamaCare are the result of deliberate political choices, which HHS and the White House are compounding with secrecy and stonewalling.
The health industry and low-level Administration officials warned that the exchanges were badly off schedule and not stress-tested despite three years to prepare and more than a half-billion dollars in funding. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and her planners swore they'd be ready while impugning critics and even withholding documents from the HHS inspector general for a routine performance audit this summer.
******
Other failures have the same political character. Consumers must set up a complex account with sensitive personal information like Social Security numbers before they are allowed to browse health plans. The government wants to show consumers only their net out-of-pocket premiums minus subsidies, not the true underlying cost of insurance. That's because those all-in quotes are so much higher than what's available on the individual market.
HHS continues to claim that the exchanges are all about competition—they're even trying to rebrand them as "marketplaces." But real marketplaces are transparent and let consumers know what they get for what price. ObamaCare's exchanges are intended to obscure price and service options.
******
Before the rollout, Mr. Obama and Mrs. Sebelius likened the exchanges to a new Apple product and asked for forbearance as problems were fixed. But Apple doesn't ship products that don't work and then force everyone to buy them, and a private business executive who supervised a fiasco like this would already have been fired.
Friday, October 18, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
CNN
Friday, October 18, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
CNN - "they're constantly upgrading the system ..."
Friday, October 18, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Pretty grim; it includes one man on the ground being casually shot by one of the terrorists.
Friday, October 18, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Thursday, October 17, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I don't like Bloomberg, but in this he's right.
Bloomberg Faults Congress for ‘Kicking the Can Down the Road’
All this does is give the Dems a short term gloat, over how they "won." At the end of the year, and into January they will be at it again.
Thursday, October 17, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Not necessarily a pretty sight. At least they left the undies on.
This is definitely worth a look.
Average American Male's Body Compared To Bodies Of Men From Other Nations
Lamm constructed the 3D models based on body measurements collected from thousands of men by universities and government agencies -- including the CDC, the Netherlands' RIVM, and France's ENNS. The average American male has a body mass index (BMI) of 29 -- significantly higher than Japanese men (who have a BMI of 23), men in the Netherlands (who have a 25.2 BMI), and French men (who have a 25.55 BMI.)
Lamm said he used BMI charts and photos for visual reference, and ran the models by Dr. Matthew Reed, an expert on body shape measurement, for accuracy.
"I chose the Netherlands because they are the tallest country and are clearly doing something right there," Lamm said. He chose Japan because it is well-known for its longevity, and France because, he said, "a lot of Americans like to compare themselves to that country."
Wednesday, October 16, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Kind of an amusing take on the debacle (I chronicled my personal brush/take on the rollout here Went to the NY State health exchange last night and here NY State Health Exchange - pretty easy to get onto; then the nightmare begins ) from James Taranto in WSJ.
Here's a bit more, as Taranto comments and quotes the NY Times op ed guys, as they whistle past the graveyard.
Some pro-ObamaCare commentators, including at the Times, are still dug in. Former Enron adviser Paul Krugman asserted Sunday that soon "ObamaCare will be working fine." And the day after that damning news story, columnist Bill Keller waved away the failure:
Unless you've been bamboozled by the frantic fictions of the right wing, you know that the Affordable Care Act, familiarly known as Obamacare, has begun to accomplish its first goal: enrolling millions of uninsured Americans, many of whom have been living one medical emergency away from the poorhouse. You realize those computer failures that have hampered sign-ups in the early days--to the smug delight of the critics--confirm that there is enormous popular demand. You have probably figured out that the real mission of the Republican extortionists and their big-money backers was to scuttle the law before most Americans recognized it as a godsend and rendered it politically untouchable.
Wednesday, October 16, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Tuesday, October 15, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Tuesday, October 15, 2013 | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments