Johns Hopkins Study: Mixed results on various gun control measures

Funny how this hasn't been more widely covered by the media -

Here's one perspective, with one spin:

A study released by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health declares there is no evidence “assault weapon” bans lead to a lower “incidence of fatal mass shootings.”

And here's another from the study, with a different spin:

Firearm purchaser licensing laws that require an in-person application or fingerprinting are associated with an estimated 56 percent fewer fatal mass shootings in states that have them, according to a new study by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

The researchers also found evidence that laws banning large-capacity magazines, defined as those that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, were associated with significant reductions in the rate of fatal mass shootings with four or more fatalities and the number killed in those shootings. The size and precision of the estimated effects of LCM bans varied across many statistical analyses presented in study.

For some reason "their study omitted the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School in which 26 were killed". And that in a state (CT) with licensing regulations. Also left out - Illinois, which has strict gun control laws but plenty of gun violence in Chicago.