Very good. This is also worthwhile. NY Times answers the question, "Are masks necessary outdoors?"
Post a comment
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
« Amazing - Brigid new hobby | Main | AI analysis of Dead Sea Scrolls: more than one scribe »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Thank you Tom.
Posted by: maria | Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 08:35 AM
We just got yelled out for gardening without masks in our own front yard. The irritating young woman kept moving.
Posted by: maria | Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 10:02 AM
I just met a lady after Mass who was wearing 3 masks outdoors. When another lady asked her why 3, her reply was why not. Insane.
Posted by: Valeria Kondratiev | Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 08:58 PM
I always use one word to categorize such events....
MADNESS.
But my personal favorite this week was witnessing a woman eating outdoors who kept her DOUBLE MASKS on---while moving them up and down between bites of food. Yes. Thir time I have seen it this year. So disgusting was her outer mask---because she kept misjudging the placement of the fork and her face diapers--that the couple sitting next door asked to be moved to another table!
However the one that recently drove home the madness was the conversation overheard from two teen girls---who were rejoicing that "the government had outlawed church singing for everyone's safety"...as they talked about how exciting it was that some band they liked might have a concert this summer....
Madness indeed.
Posted by: maria | Wednesday, April 28, 2021 at 05:18 AM