« "The 7 Telltale Signs Your Newborn Baby Is A Racist" | Main | Memorial Day - nice: bringing closure for families who lost relatives on WWII submarines »

Saturday, May 29, 2021


Valeria Kondratiev

Now we know why they’re pushing vaccination on children, who are not at risk.



NW 332

While children appear to be less affected by Covid, they are NOT without risk. In addition, an article published yesterday by Harvard Medical School’s Harvard Health Publishing titled “Coronavirus Outbreak and Kids” states:

“Early studies suggested that children do not contribute much to the spread of coronavirus. But more recent studies raise concerns that children could be capable of spreading the infection… Though the recent studies varied in their methods, their findings were similar: infected children had as much, or more, coronavirus in their upper respiratory tracts as infected adults… the presence of high viral loads in infected children does increase the concern that children, even those without symptoms, could readily spread the infection to others…”
“Further, vaccinating children will be critical to achieving a population-wide level of immunity — herd immunity — sufficient to slow the emergence of dangerous variants and bring an end to the pandemic.”

tom faranda

So different priorities have to be weighed up. The fact is they don't have enough data.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)