"One cop died for probably doing his job incorrectly."
Resulting in her being fired. Good. It's a short video with some wonderful and inspirational material in the last three minutes.
May 2022
Leftist cant
Mainstream conservative
Talk radio
Libertarian
« December 2021 | Main | February 2022 »
Monday, January 31, 2022
NY Times: "Democrats Decried Dark Money. Then They Won With It in 2020."
In the NY Times, an extensive analysis. Hit the link for the whole article. The sleaze of politics - even if it is legal. Glad I''m a registered independent.
A New York Times analysis reveals how the left outdid the right at raising and spending millions from undisclosed donors to defeat Donald Trump and win power in Washington.
For much of the last decade, Democrats complained — with a mix of indignation, frustration and envy — that Republicans and their allies were spending hundreds of millions of difficult-to-trace dollars to influence politics.
“Dark money” became a dirty word, as the left warned of the threat of corruption posed by corporations and billionaires that were spending unlimited sums through loosely regulated nonprofits, which did not disclose their donors’ identities.
Then came the 2020 election.
Spurred by opposition to then-President Trump, donors and operatives allied with the Democratic Party embraced dark money with fresh zeal, pulling even with and, by some measures, surpassing Republicans in 2020 spending, according to a New York Times analysis of tax filings and other data.
The analysis shows that 15 of the most politically active nonprofit organizations that generally align with the Democratic Party spent more than $1.5 billion in 2020 — compared to roughly $900 million spent by a comparable sample of 15 of the most politically active groups aligned with the G.O.P.
****************
A single, cryptically named entity that has served as a clearinghouse of undisclosed cash for the left, the Sixteen Thirty Fund, received mystery donations as large as $50 million and disseminated grants to more than 200 groups, while spending a total of $410 million in 2020 — more than the Democratic National Committee itself.
But nonprofits do not abide by the same transparency rules or donation limits as parties or campaigns — though they can underwrite many similar activities: advertising, polling, research, voter registration and mobilization and legal fights over voting rules.
The scale of secret spending is such that, even as small donors have become a potent force in politics, undisclosed money dwarfed the 2020 campaign fund-raising of President Biden (who raised a record $1 billion) and Mr. Trump (who raised more than $810 million).
Headed into the midterm elections, Democrats are warning major donors not to give in to the financial complacency that often afflicts the party in power, while Republicans are rushing to level the dark-money playing field to take advantage of what is expected to be a favorable political climate in 2022.
At stake is not just control of Congress but also whether Republican donors will become more unified with Mr. Trump out of the White House. Two Republican secret-money groups focused on Congress said their combined fund-raising reached nearly $100 million in 2021 — far more than they raised in 2019.
Sunday, January 30, 2022
Rafael Nadal wins 21st tennis Grand Slam tournament (the Australia Open) - " a record-breaking 21st grand slam title."
And a huge comeback in the finals! Nadal is Spanish and 35 years old. He was sixth seed in the tournament.
Here are eight minutes of highlights.
Time has not been good to Neil Young.
UPDATE: From my reader NB -
Here's a FB post amid all the Neil Young memes:
Under 30: don't know who Neil Young is
30-60: didn't know Neil Young was still alive
Over 60: what is Spotify?
I suppose most people under 50 years old don't know who Neil Young is. He certainly was a creative musician in the late 60's though to the 80's. Crosby Stills Nash and Young as a for instance.
That's Young on the left.
Young is in the news now as he's pulled his music off Spotify because he doesn't like Joe Rogan, their podcaster (11 million listeners) who has a $100 million ten year deal with them. He gave Spotify an ultimatum - Joe Rogan or me which was an easy decision for them...
Here he is in 1866 - a little unfair to compare 1966 to today ... I suppose
And then in 1972
But now - age 76 - oh dear. Record breaking turkey neck?
On the other hand, he is married to Daryl Hannah ... Maybe turkey necks are in? I think it worked for Reagan...
Saturday, January 29, 2022
Democrat Party intellectual Joy Behar: Clarence Thomas not really black; Amy Coney Barrett not really a woman
At 79 years old, Joy Behar just gets smarter and smarter. And it works for her; annual salary $7 million.
The bigotry was suffused throughout the entire segment. It first reared its ugly head when co-host Sunny Hostin suggested Thomas didn’t care about other black people:
HAINES: And of course, the representation more than anything, you pointed out, first black woman. There’s only been two black men. Those numbers are a little shocking.
SUNNY HOSTIN: And one doesn’t really represent the black community.
HAINES: No.
A few minutes later, co-host Joy Behar busted out the air quotes when it came to Coney Barrett’s womanhood and Thomas’s blackness. “You could make the case that somebody like Amy Coney Barrett was put in there because she’s a white woman,” she griped. “Who they say, well, she’ll go against abortion rights and she’s ‘a woman.’ So that was deliberate, I think. Clarence Thomas, ‘a black guy, a black man,’ a justice, okay, I’ll give it to him.”
Adding: “He’s a smart guy, but he is to the right of Attila the Hun, this guy. And they put him in there saying, oh, a black man will go against voting rights, which is what he does.”
Friday, January 28, 2022
Brigid's poem - the mighty Kinglet
One of the smallest of birds - they weigh about a quarter of an ounce. Brigid recently passed this along to a couple of her poetry groups and they loved it. The book where Brigid discovered the Kinglet and notes are below the poem.
Thursday, January 27, 2022
Wednesday, January 26, 2022
Pro-abortion folks pay a visit to St. Patrick's Cathedral
And they're entitled to - First amendment. Hit the link below for the whole story.
“Go to h*** b****,” one protester screamed at a churchgoer. Multiple other demonstrators screamed “F*** you” and made obscene gestures as a range of people from young children to elderly men and women exited the midtown Manhattan church.
In addition to the vulgarities, demonstrators chanted “Shame,” “Thank God for abortion,” “Go home fascists, go home,” and “New York hates you,” along with pro-choice slogans aimed at churchgoers.
Toward the end of the protest, pro-abortion slogans including "God loves abortion," and "Abortion forever" were illuminated up on the exterior of the cathedral as demonstrators cheered. On Jan. 20 in Washington, D.C., another activist group, Catholics for Choice, projected pro-choice slogans on the facade of the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception during a Mass and Holy Hour on the eve of the March for Life.
Approximately 100 demonstrators attended the New York City rally, which organizers dubbed "F*** the March for Life" in an Instagram post. Many of the participants used drums, shakers, and other noisemakers, which were audible to those inside the cathedral.
*******************
"When a nation founded on the right to life and the equal protection of law for all life finds such violence to be legal, as it did 49 years ago today in legalizing abortion, boy that’s tragic," Dolan said during his homily. "That’s not right. That’s not natural. That’s not the way God intended it. That’s not the way our country intended it."
BUT - then there's this from Washington DC Friday - The media finally noticed young people at the March for Life
Tuesday, January 25, 2022
New Grads: 10 things you could have bought with your college education money
I suppose this could also apply to grad school ... and getting a law degree! From the BB...
1) A house filled with a lifetime supply of food: But you paid for college instead. Now, you get to work for the rest of your life paying off a house as well as your college debt!
2) Training on how to be a long-haul trucker making 80K per year, plus 3 Ferarris: You mean your college recruiter didn't mention this?
3) 300 mail-order brides from Ukraine: The prices have never been lower!
4) All the equipment you need to rob Caesar's, the Bellagio, and the MGM Grand in one night with an elite team of 11 handsome men: Too bad. Instead, you spent all your time in class when you could have been cozying up to the suave criminal underground.
5) 35 college educations from 1980, including the time travel: It's insane that more people don't do this.
6) A friggin' spaceship: You could have had a real spaceship, or at least a ridden on a billionaire's spaceship. Sad.
7) A tank of gas and some groceries in California: Thanks, inflation!
8) Hunter Biden on your company's board for 4 months: Instead, you were forced to sit through his virtual political science course. Yawn.
9) In-person brainwashing from Ibram X. Kendi for 4 months: Instead, you sat in a dark lecture hall watching all his white privilege lectures on a crappy screen like a chump.
10) One NFT of an ape with a bored expression on his face: We live in strange times.
Monday, January 24, 2022
National Review: "We Never Took Roe for an Answer"
An editorial from National Review this past weekend. Excerpts below the link - so hit the link for the full article.
Roe is the site of the Left’s simultaneous assault on justice, morality, self-government, and simple truth. It is therefore no surprise that overturning it has long been a cause dear to our hearts. That’s why we wanted to assemble an all-star team of writers to make a thorough, reasoned, and powerful case against Roe as the Supreme Court prepared to hear arguments about it. Our special issue covered everything from Roe’s obsolete science to its shaky status as a precedent to its destructive assumptions about human flourishing.
With your help, we have been making the case against Roe and the abortion license for decades, in and out of season — even as powerful voices in our culture kept insisting that this matter was closed, this argument over. The day after Roe came down in 1973, the New York Times called it “a historic resolution of a fiercely controversial issue.” In 1992, the Supreme Court itself ordered pro-lifers to disappear: It was time for “the contending sides of a national controversy to end their national division by accepting” its edicts.
Millions of pro-lifers said no, and we along with them. If a magazine can be said to march, we’ve marched. When Republicans said it was time to move on from this issue, we argued it would be a moral and political disaster. When the press claimed that America’s women want abortion on demand, we pointed to the evidence that they don’t. When Democrats said that late-term abortion is “rare,” we explained that late-term abortions are roughly as common as gun murders.
The Court may finally undo the evil of 1973 this summer. But the argument over abortion – and related attacks on the sanctity of human life — won’t be over even if it does. And either way, we’ll keep making the case that unborn children should be protected in law and welcomed in life.
Sunday, January 23, 2022
With power and emotion the NYPD Union President speaks out on the death and injury of two young cops
A 22 year old rookie killed and a 27 year old shot in the face.
Here's the story NYPD cop killed, second officer clings to life after shooting in Harlem apartment
The video - Patrick Lynch, President of the Police Benevolent Association -
Jason Rivera is the policeman killed - read a little about him - Rivera, a married father of one, joined the force in 2020, hoping to improve the department’s connections with the community.
Saturday, January 22, 2022
Friday, January 21, 2022
Thursday, January 20, 2022
Tom Friedman in the NYT: "Putin to Ukraine: ‘Marry Me or I’ll Kill You’"
Tom Friedman - who can be very insightful when not talking about American politics - nails the Russian dictator. Sent to me by my buddy Paul. Well worth hitting the link for the whole op ed.
Let’s see: Putin is a modern-day Peter the Great out to restore the glory of Mother Russia. He’s a retired K.G.B. agent who simply refuses to come in from the cold and still sees the C.I.A. under every rock and behind every opponent. He’s America’s ex-boyfriend-from-hell, who refuses to let us ignore him and date other countries, like China — because he always measures his status in the world in relation to us. And he’s a politician trying to make sure he wins (or rigs) Russia’s 2024 election — and becomes president for life — because when you’ve siphoned off as many rubles as Putin has, you can never be sure that your successor won’t lock you up and take them all. For him, it’s rule or die.
Somewhere in the balance of all of those identities and neuroses is the answer to what Putin intends to do with Ukraine.
If I were a cynic, I’d just tell him to go ahead and take Kyiv because it would become his Kabul, his Afghanistan — but the human costs would be intolerable. Short of that, I’d be very clear: If he wants to come down from the tree in which he’s lodged himself, he’s going to have to jump or build his own ladder. He has completely contrived this crisis, so there should be no give on our part. China is watching — and Taiwan is sweating — everything we do in reaction to Vlad right now.
Wednesday, January 19, 2022
Editorial from NR: "Fauci Must Go"
Yes I agree with this. I agree with below that he was a calming voice early on... but he's past his "Use By" date.
Fauci’s own behavior has undermined public trust in the response to the pandemic: by sitting for celebrity puff profiles and documentaries, by stifling public debate about the origins of Covid-19 and the proper response to it, by responding in lawyerly and evasive fashion to questions about NIH research dollars supporting work at the Wuhan lab. In his nasty spats with Senator Rand Paul and other officeholders, he hasn’t simply parried criticisms but tried to land political blows himself.
It has always been bizarre that the head of an obscure agency has soaked up so much media attention. Over the past two years, Fauci has done so many interviews with so many outlets — from Sunday shows to obscure podcasts — that one wonders how he had time for his day job. Nearly everyone in Washington enjoys being in front of a microphone, but even the most shameless media hogs might blush at Fauci’s interview schedule.... How did the appearance of Fauci on the cover of InStyle, sitting by the pool in sunglasses, declaring, “With all due modesty, I think I’m pretty effective,” advance public health?
Fauci has been subject to unfair attacks and deranged threats, and made the subject of hysterical “plandemic” conspiracy theories. He deserved none of these. He arguably played a valuable role in the early stages of the pandemic, when many Americans found him a comforting voice. He was an experienced doctor and public-health official who had served every president since Ronald Reagan, and he had passed through and learned from the political storms and medical uncertainties of the AIDS crisis. When President Trump was inconstant, was inattentive, or seemed to wish away the crisis, Fauci presented a sober, reassuring confidence in the power of scientific inquiry to help us navigate this crisis.
But that was a long time ago. By his own admission, Fauci misleads the public. When trying to explain why, before he adopted them for himself, he had disparaged the use of cloth masks, he explained that people in the public-health community were trying to preserve masks for front-line workers. “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” he said in March 2020. “When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is...." Score this as a lie and a slur. This was a public that was already making wrenching, unthinkable sacrifices — with Americans forgoing the funerals of loved ones, surrendering their jobs, and closing down their businesses — in an attempt to meet the ultimately unrealistic task public health had set for them of stopping the spread of Covid-19. They deserved candor.
*****************
Fauci’s political dispositions shape his alarmism and discredited him with a large swath of the country that any viable public-health strategy has to be able to reach. ...
Fauci’s claim that he himself “represents the science” and his admitted deceptions of the public are incompatible with each other and intolerably insolent to boot. Most important, they subvert and undermine American self-government. He must go.
Tuesday, January 18, 2022
Punishment for Pedophile! "Britain Makes Example Of Prince Andrew By Not Washing His Rolls-Royce"
Harsh, very harsh.
“Some may consider this too harsh a penalty on a member of the royal family,” said a spokesman for the royal family, Bartletonby Thorngraveburry, while adjusting his monocle and pulling out his snuff bag. “However, her royal highness insists Britain make an example of the man, to assure future princes do a better job of not getting photographed with underage girls on the luxury rape islands of creepy hedge fund billionaires.”
The spokesman listed additional punishments to the royal press corps, confirming the Queens pledge to make Prince Andrew wish he’d never become besties with Jeffrey Epstein, including:
-
- No more gold-flaked crumpets unless he asks politely
- Tea still allowed, but no biscuits
- He may only play polo with the gimpy royal horse
- Ownership of ski chalets reduced to three
- All must say “Prince Andrew” with an aire of haughty disdain
World leaders have praised the Queen’s actions, and all are happy the nation of Britain, or England, or The United Kingdom, or whatever, is finally on the road to healing.
Monday, January 17, 2022
Martin Luther King, Jr. - Here's his "Letter from Birmingham Jail"
Certainly an important and famous document - it takes 20 minutes to read (I re-read it yesterday). A call to non-compliance and nonviolent civil disobedience in the face of evil. Here is a good discussion of the letter off wikipedia.
And here is the letter - a small excerpt below the link but the whole thing is well worth twenty minutes.
... I am in Birmingham because injustice is here. Just as the eighth-century prophets left their little villages and carried their "thus saith the Lord" far beyond the boundaries of their hometowns; and just as the Apostle Paul left his little village of Tarsus and carried the gospel of Jesus Christ to practically every hamlet and city of the Greco-Roman world, I too am compelled to carry the gospel of freedom beyond my particular hometown. ....
Moreover, I am cognizant of the interrelatedness of all communities and states. I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial "outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider.
***********************
IN ANY nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive, negotiation, self-purification, and direct action. We have gone through all of these steps in Birmingham. There can be no gainsaying of the fact that racial injustice engulfs this community. Birmingham is probably the most thoroughly segregated city in the United States.
YOU express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, it is rather strange and paradoxical to find us consciously breaking laws. One may well ask, "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "An unjust law is no law at all."
Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust. All segregation statutes are unjust because segregation distorts the soul and damages the personality. It gives the segregator a false sense of superiority and the segregated a false sense of inferiority. To use the words of Martin Buber, the great Jewish philosopher, segregation substitutes an "I -it" relationship for the "I -thou" relationship and ends up relegating persons to the status of things. So segregation is not only politically, economically, and sociologically unsound, but it is morally wrong and sinful. Paul Tillich has said that sin is separation. Isn't segregation an existential expression of man's tragic separation, an expression of his awful estrangement, his terrible sinfulness? So I can urge men to obey the 1954 decision of the Supreme Court because it is morally right, and I can urge them to disobey segregation ordinances because they are morally wrong.
******************************************
I MUST make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizens Councillor or the Ku Klux Klanner but the white moderate who is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says, "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically feels that he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time; and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.
***************************************
... as I continued to think about the matter, I gradually gained a bit of satisfaction from being considered an extremist. Was not Jesus an extremist in love? --"Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, pray for them that despitefully use you." Was not Amos an extremist for justice? --"Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream." Was not Paul an extremist for the gospel of Jesus Christ? --"I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus." Was not Martin Luther an extremist? --"Here I stand; I can do no other so help me God." Was not John Bunyan an extremist? --"I will stay in jail to the end of my days before I make a mockery of my conscience." Was not Abraham Lincoln an extremist? --"This nation cannot survive half slave and half free." Was not Thomas Jefferson an extremist? --"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal." So the question is not whether we will be extremist, but what kind of extremists we will be. Will we be extremists for hate, or will we be extremists for love? Will we be extremists for the preservation of injustice, or will we be extremists for the cause of justice?
Sunday, January 16, 2022
Beautiful: "The prehistoric newborn called “Neve”..."
Here's a short, fascinating column about a 10,000 year old grave discovered in an Italian cave. And here are two even more fascinating links from within this article. oldest burial of a newborn girl discovered so far in Europe. And "the remains of a two- to three-year-old child buried with extraordinary care by a community of early Homo sapiens some 78,000 years ago."
The Italian infant story -
The little bundle was discovered in a cave in Liguria (northwestern Italy) and is the oldest burial of a newborn girl discovered so far in Europe.
And that’s not all. Her burial has left scholars amazed; the child was, in fact, wrapped in a shroud including seashell jewelry. More precisely, her bones (only a few survived the millennia) were found surrounded by more than 60 beads made of pierced seashells; four pendants, also made from pierced fragments of bivalves; and an eagle-owl talon.
********************
This discovery allows us to investigate an exceptional funerary rite from the early Mesolithic phase, an era of which few burials are known, and testifies to how all members of the community, even newborns, were recognized as full persons and apparently enjoyed egalitarian treatment.
********************
The chronicle of this exceptional discovery makes us take a step beyond archaeology. Our ancestors left us a thoughtful message: even the smallest and most fragile life should be cared for attentively. The great value of this small person is testified by the devotion and care given to her, even in her burial.
This happened 10,000 years ago, during “a period that probably marked great social changes in human populations, linked to the adaptations due to the end of the last ice age,” according to Il Secolo XIX.
Saturday, January 15, 2022
Friday, January 14, 2022
Thursday, January 13, 2022
Media ratings - why Spotify paid Joe Rogan $100 million
Wow. What a demolition. Average viewers per show (millions). FULL DISCLOSURE: I don't listen to Joe Rogan.
CNN not even averaging a million viewers. How the mighty have fallen.
Wednesday, January 12, 2022
Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Supreme Court Justice Sotomayer and Covid basic facts
Sotomayer loves to make up her own facts - she did so on the Dobbs case also. Sonia Sotomayor went to Cardinal Spellman HS in the Bronx. They must be shaking their heads...
A retweet originally from The Rev. Patrick Mahoney
"We have over 100,000 children, which we've never had before, in serious condition, many on ventilators."--Justice Sotomayor. According to the CDC, the true number is 3,700. How can she POSSIBLY issue a ruling on vaccine mandates when she is so ignorant of the facts? #COVID19
UPDATE: Here's what the White House Press Secretary had to say:
Monday, January 10, 2022
Beautiful! "Mi Abuela Panchita" - 2 minute video with an enduring message.
This was a filler on PBS and we managed to find it on youtube. You can find who the Bishop is here - Bishop Ricardo Ramirez.
UK: Ex-head of vaccine task force says time to learn to live with Covid; end mass jabs
From the Guardian (UK). They have no paywall so anyone can hit the link for the whole article.
With health chiefs and senior Tories also lobbying for a post-pandemic plan for a straining NHS, Dr Clive Dix called for a major rethink of the UK’s Covid strategy, in effect reversing the approach of the past two years and returning to a “new normality”.
“We need to analyse whether we use the current booster campaign to ensure the vulnerable are protected, if this is seen to be necessary,” he said. “Mass population-based vaccination in the UK should now end.”
He said ministers should urgently back research into Covid immunity beyond antibodies to include B-cells and T-cells (white blood cells). This could help create vaccines for vulnerable people specific to Covid variants, he said, adding: “We now need to manage disease, not virus spread. So stopping progression to severe disease in vulnerable groups is the future objective.”
His intervention comes as it was revealed that more than 150,000 people across the UK have now died from Covid. Official figures published on Saturday recorded a further 313 deaths, the highest daily number since February last year when the last peak was receding. It takes total recorded deaths within 28 days of a positive Covid test to 150,057. Boris Johnson, the prime minister, tweeted in response: “Coronavirus has taken a terrible toll on our country and today the number of deaths recorded has reached 150,000.
More if you hit the above link.
Sunday, January 09, 2022
Saturday, January 08, 2022
"7 ... Signs That Trump Will Be Named President In 2022" - Yes, satire and parody
Hahaha.
1) An orange sun rises in the east: Electromagnetic radiation scattering across the atmosphere has been heralding his return for thousands of years.
2) If you add up all the digits in 2022, you get 6, which is the exact number of letters in the name DONALD: I double-checked with a calculator. It’s legit.
3) Satanic pedophiles are acting really nervous: They clearly know something we don’t. They’re also great for stock tips.
4) QAnon Shaman saw a bald eagle fly by his solitary confinement cell window: I dreamed it happened so it must be true. I certainly couldn’t go talk to him.
5) As I took the trash out this morning, a little orange bird rested on a tree branch in front of me and sang a beautiful tune: Clear sign.
6) If you look in the ‘Bible Code,’ there’s a place where the words ‘Orange King,’ ‘Ruler Who Rules,’ ‘Twenty-Two,’ and ‘Big Mac’ all intersect: Only true prophecies are hidden and hard to understand. My pal, Fred, has been coding ciphers for years and he knows what he’s talking about.
7) I got a text message asking me to send $10 so that Trump can share some "very exciting news" with me: This is it, you guys!
Please remember, all prophecies not from God have a huge margin of error. But I have a good feeling about these.
Friday, January 07, 2022
Sidney Poitier
Sidney Poitier was 94 years old. I remember him from Lilies of the Field which won him an Academy Award. The first African American to win the best actor award. His family was all from the Bahamas (where he died), but he was born in Miami, making him a citizen automatically. I think he was a wonderful actor; very versatile - able to play a variety of roles. I'm sure In the Heat of the Night was his most well-known movie.
Thursday, January 06, 2022
WSJ: "Democracy isn't Dying"
Of course, good editorial. Saying it was an attempt to overthrow the government is like saying the burning looting rioting in 2020 was a peaceful protest. For other interesting commentary go here. Including this gem - "I wouldn't think an insurrection involves taking selfies, being unarmed and having gates opened to let you in."
One lesson is that on all the available evidence Jan. 6 was not an “insurrection,” in any meaningful sense of that word. It was not an attempted coup. The Justice Department and the House Select Committee have looked high and low for a conspiracy to overthrow the government, and maybe they will find it. So far they haven’t.
There apparently was a “war room” of motley characters at the Willard hotel and small groups of plotters who wanted to storm the barricades. But they were too disorganized to do much more than incite what became the mob that breached the Capitol.
The Justice Department says some 725 people from nearly all 50 states have been charged in the riot, linked mainly by social media and support for Donald Trump. About 70 defendants have had their cases adjudicated to date, and 31 of those will do time in prison. The rioters aren’t getting off easy.
They also didn’t come close to overturning the election....
The true man at the margin was Mike Pence. Presiding in the Senate as Vice President, he recognized his constitutional duty as largely ceremonial in certifying the vote count. He stood up to Mr. Trump’s threats for the good of the country and perhaps at the cost of his political future.
In other words, America’s democratic institutions held up under pressure. They also held in the states in which GOP officials and legislators certified electoral votes despite Mr. Trump’s complaints. And they held in the courts as judges rejected claims of election theft that lacked enough evidence. Democrats grudgingly admit these facts but say it was a close run thing. It wasn’t. It was a near-unanimous decision against Mr. Trump’s electoral claims.
None of this absolves Mr. Trump for his behavior. He isn’t the first candidate to question an election result; Hillary Clinton still thinks Vladimir Putin defeated her in 2016. But he was wrong to give his supporters false hope that Congress and Mr. Pence could overturn the electoral vote. He did not directly incite violence, but he did incite them to march on the Capitol.
Worse, he failed to act to stop the riot even as he watched on TV from the White House. He failed to act despite the pleading of family and allies. This was a monumental failure of character and duty. Republicans have gone mute on this dereliction as they try to stay united for the midterms. But they will face a reckoning on this with voters if Mr. Trump runs in 2024.
As for the Pelosi Democrats, the question is when will they ever let Jan. 6 go? The latest news is that the Speaker’s Select Committee may hold prime-time hearings this year, and the leaks are that they may even seek an indictment of Mr. Trump for obstructing Congress.
Really? Their constitutional power runs to impeachment, and they’ve already impeached Mr. Trump twice. As our friends at the New York Sun note, such a prosecutorial inquiry runs close to what the Constitution bars as a “bill of attainder” against a single individual. As a way of harming Mr. Trump’s future prospects, we suspect it would work about as well as both impeachments did.
********************
None of this leaves much cause for optimism—but then we survived Jan. 6, as well as more than a few bad Presidents. Keep your eye on the Constitution’s enduring principles and institutions, and who sustains or tears them down. That’s where self-government will live or die.
"Top CNN Moments of 2021"
As curated by the Babylon Bee. The list of ten; you have to hit the first link to get to all of them. I've excerpted just one.
The Babylon Bee Presents: Top CNN Moments Of 2021
May 17: CNN Hires Trump As News Anchor To Recover Lost Viewers
What do you do when ratings are plummeting? Call Trump, that's what! Now, CNN's ratings are fantastic. Best ratings of all time, maybe ever.
Wednesday, January 05, 2022
Search
Recent Posts
- Wednesday's wordle
- The Tuesday wordle
- Yanks end three game losing streak with unlikely hitting hero.
- Monday's wordle
- Archbishop Cordileone explains banning Ms. Pelosi from receiving communion
- Abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison died on this date, age 73
- Breaking News: Elon Musk makes offer to buy FBI
- Sunday wordle
- CNN, 3 minutes: Satellite views of Ukraine "horrifying"
- Here was Saturday's wordle
Recent Comments